
Friday, March 8, 2013
On Any Given Day

Friday, February 22, 2013
Friday, February 15, 2013
Media Release: Team Fryday

Friday, February 8, 2013
Carpe Diem
It is rare on a Friday for Fryday not to have something to write about. Usually there is something worthy of a little borax or humour. Most of whatever that is comes to me late and Fryday is written hurriedly to catch the moment. Today there is nothing waiting for me: no gift, no pearl of wisdom, no interest from The Muse—and she is not a woman to be forced. No woman is, of course. A man is tempting fate if he tries to mould a woman into his ideal and schoolboy fantasy—or is it schoolgirl fantasy? A much better—and safer—route is to find the exact woman you want off the shelf. There are plenty to choose from. Fortunately I have never been particularly good at shopping. If my wish-list is a diminutive, submissive woman whose brain can be turned on and off, then I have been sadly amiss with those whom I have chosen to be my close friends and confidants. I am surrounded by wonder women none of whom completely fits my superficial ideal, my perfect woman. They are too perfect for that. This week I attended the funeral of a friend’s wife. As I recall, I met her only once but found her charming. She must have been quite something, for the manner in which she was eulogised and the devastation her sudden death caused her husband.
I had to leave the funeral early, I have been unwell this week and vulnerable. But that too only demonstrated the beauty of women, a suite of whom enveloped me this week with compassion, concern and sincerity. They know who they are. So if I have somehow fashioned a Fryday celebrating women, foisted on me because I had nothing else to write about, let that not diminish the sincerity of the sentiment. Rather acknowledge if you will that we have a Fryday, and that, before I started writing it, I didn’t know how lucky I was.
Friday, February 1, 2013
Mr Speaker
To be the Speaker of New Zealand’s parliament is to be one of the most important persons in the land. It could be argued that you are there of and at the whim of the Prime Minister. But you have the right, enshrined by royal decree, to call even a prime minister to account, as did the (now) former speaker Lockwood Smith when he called Prime Minister John Key a naughty boy.
I know Lockwood Smith well. I have had the privilege to meet him on many occasions—some have been political, some have been business and some (most) have been entertaining—Lockwood is a fine singer and poet and not slow to show it. In all those meetings and all those roles he has afforded me the greatest courtesy, something others have shared and this week noted voluminously. Lockwood is like that—old school. And if that is to be seen that he is also pompous and pedantic—also noted this week—then in the role of speaker those are not necessarily bad traits and could even be deemed to eminently practical. Lockwood, the dairy farmer from up north brought a gravitas to the role of speaker, something his successor, David Carter, the dairy farmer from down south, seemingly has the traits to emulate. Parliament can be a raucous place—Winston Peters on his own ensures it is so—and Question Time on television is pure theatre, I often wonder what my friend Whetu thinks of it, but with Lockwood Smith at the helm it was rarely directionless and if at times he came across as a headmaster scolding parliamentary school children—then that is simply what he was…and who they are.
Friday, January 11, 2013
The Fryday Fry Up
The blog version of Fryday goes out on the Internet and is of course accessible there to anybody anywhere with a computer and a connection. Whilst I can’t determine who is reading Fryday, I can monitor the numbers, where they are from and what they are reading. A random look at the blog stats yesterday got even me questioning Fryday’s attraction. It appears that one person (presumably one) spent over an hour in one session reading Fryday and in the process got through sixteen pages. Now, that is very gratifying and I am flattered that they found Fryday Quite Interesting (to coin a phrase). But what I found Quite Interesting was that the person was in Brazil and the entry-page they started with was an item on Tuku Morgan. What possible interest would a Brazilian have in Tuku Morgan, even if Tuku Morgan may be persuaded to have an interest in a Brazilian—underpants tend to chaff, after all. Nevertheless some Brazilian has taken to Tuku and from there ventured elsewhere in the Fryday Realm.
Quite Interesting, and, yes, I am getting to that point—an unashamed plug for another Fry up: the Stephen Fry hosted, John Lloyd conceived, BBC series QI on Prime each weeknight at 7.00. It is truly addictive as the erudite Stephen Fry presents an ever-changing panel of comedians and other celebrities with an array of little known but (seemingly) unassailable facts upon which they are invited to comment by way of confirming or otherwise the veracity of such facts. Points are deducted if the obvious but wrong answer is given; points are awarded if the answers are QI—Quite Interesting. There is such a profusion and confusion of facts that I can’t remember them all, but here are a few from memory. See if you can answer them correctly.
1. In what year did the Second World War between the Allies and Germany end?
2. The Spanish national anthem is sung in what language?
3. How many legs has a centipede and what is extremely odd about the answer?
4. At one time or other one-eighth of all Californians have insured themselves for what?
5. According to a survey, 46% of all Americans can’t read well enough to read what?
That’s the type of thing that in the deft hands of Stephen Fry QI on Prime is compulsive viewing—even if they are yet to find even one remotely interesting fact about Hamilton.
Friday, January 4, 2013
Slàinte, sonas agus beartas
Oscar Wilde said of the United States and the United Kingdom that they had everything in common except language. He was right of course. In their land of excess, Americans have paradoxically opted for minimalism in language. They have dropped more letters than a disgruntled south Auckland postie on P. And rearranged more letters than a Mt Eden prostitute on a good night. Color=colour, flavor=flavour, meter=metre, etc.
Which is why I find it surprising, musing on this over the Christmas break, that in one area dear to me Americans have elected to add a letter, the letter E to whisky. They spell it whiskey, which is the way the Irish spell it and that in itself may be an explanation, given the Irish influence in early America.
There are almost as many American whiskies as there are Scotch whiskies (in the plural both countries employ the E) and the distinctions are many.
In the interests of robust research I have sampled—and will continue to sample—as many as I can.
Scotch is the form and firm favourite for me though. Helensville is the site of the only successful Scotch invasion since Braveheart and will, hopefully, last a lot longer. There is little more enjoyable to me than the big blustery, take-no-prisoner single-malts from Islay (pronounced Eye-Lah) and the favour of friends. With that in mind and glass in hand I raised a few drams to you this happy Hogmanay.
Allow me to do so again with a Scottish greeting I like, plus, appropriately, a translation for all my Fryday friends:
May the best ye hae ivver seen be the warst ye'll ivver see.
May the moose ne'er lea' yer girnal wi a tear-drap in its ee.
May ye aye keep hail an hertie till ye'r auld eneuch tae dee.
May ye aye juist be sae happie as A wuss ye aye tae be.
The above, in translation, reads:
May the best you have ever seen be the worst you will ever see.
May the mouse never leave your grain store with a tear drop in its eye.
May you always stay hale and hearty until you are old enough to die.
May you still be as happy as I always wish you to be.
Slàinte, sonas agus beartas
(Health, wealth and happiness)
Fyday.
Friday, December 7, 2012
Whetu Calls: It's in the water
Friday, November 16, 2012
Sick to Death
Yesterday I had the pleasure of enjoying a couple of hours in the company of a couple of intelligent and articulate friends. The adjectives are of course relative; all my friends are intelligent and articulate, in their own way rather than by degree. Each of us has a contribution to make to the world.
Everybody enhances it.
Well almost.
I wonder if, like me, the child killers in our midst heartedly sicken you. We had another yesterday: Joel Loffley, the killer of two year-old JJ Lawrence. JJ is just the most recent of a long long list of such toddlers and Loffley is –most frightening—just the most recently convicted of an unknown number of killers and potential killers who will ram yet another photo of an awesomely cute young kid on to our televisions and in to our newspapers.
This Fryday is, to be honest, not going where I wanted it to go. But I think there is a question to be asked.
And it concerns commonality in such killers.
Yesterday, I read that a couple of treaty settlements had been signed. One was for $10 million; the other—to Ngati Whatua Orakei—was for $18 million cash, other assets and an apology. We are told it addresses 150 years of grievances. And we, New Zealand, have to apologise for that. I take issue with that—both the predication, and the settlement that implicitly subjugates one part of society to another.
There is not a lot I can do about it, though.
However, if we are going to shell out that type of money to iwi (and we are told that Ngati Whatua now has $500 million in assets) do we not have the right to ask THAT question? That question being:
When are you going to stop killing your kids?
Friday, November 9, 2012
Not Bothered
God Botherer is not a term I ever use to describe my religious friends. Mainly because I have no religious friends, or at least none deserving of that derisory epithet. But I know what the term means, implicitly and effectively, and it is entirely accurate. These people do bother God. They bother God because, I think, He’s thinking, “Who the Hell are they talking about ?” The God they are talking about—the tele-evangalists, the people who come knocking at my door—bear no relation to the God I was taught about at Sunday School. The God I was taught about was kind, compassionate, all-embracing; not a redneck, bigoted, self-styled moral arbiter with an obscene bank account and a hankering to delve into secular politics.
Mitt Romney’s problems were two-fold. The first was that he represented a party with archaic values. The Republican Party, the Grand Old Party, is these days neither grand nor, given its ideological splits, a party. But it is old and long out of touch with progressive thought and a young vote determined to reshape the world. It will find it hard to bounce back from this, and almost impossible to do so in its present form.
The second reason I believe that Mitt Romney lost this election—and I believe that he did lose this election, Obama didn’t win it (not with 8% unemployment)—was his religion. Religion is all very laudable, but when it governs all that you do, and therefore, if applied to a President, governs all that you and I do, then it becomes dangerous and these days unacceptable. We saw that with George W. Bush (remember him?) and the memory of war-mongering Bush is still fresh and haunting. It haunted Mitt Romney and ultimately—I believe—played a large part in his losing the election.
I once said and remain of the view that the American presidency is so important to the world that Americans should be excluded from voting—its like putting a squirrel in charge of a nut farm; but on this occasion they made the right choice. Thank God.
Friday, November 2, 2012
For they shall inherit
A few weeks ago I had the occasion to write of the new-found pleasure of nieces, nephews and goddaughters. I revisit that today for two reasons—light and dark. The light is that it is soon to be my goddaughter’s birthday and, through that, I have found another pleasure—buying gifts. Happy birthday Lilia. Love you.
Also on the light side of delight is the accumulation of pseudo-relatives: L in Whangaparaoa who has so much to share and G in Queenstown, whom I have met only once, but of whom I am taking a paternalistic view. And if my niece in Christchurch, Jessica, who shares my love of snail-mail, has not yet replied to my letter, I blame not her, but her mother. Get your act together sister.
The dark side is this
It is time for us all to put an end to the torture and liking of our children. It is time for us to state the obvious: there is no greater crime on earth than to torture and then kill a child. For those who are found guilty of doing so, of ending such a young life, there should be no life. If I am not advocating the death penalty for this crime, I am at least saying there should be no life of freedom, there should be no 12 years and then release, there should be only prison and death. This awful crime deserves nothing less.
And for those who blame me—society—for these horrendous crimes: FO. If you were less PC about these things, and if you were to Google child torture and killings in New Zealand and then Google Maori child torture and killings in New Zealand and find a striking similarity of the two lists then we may start getting somewhere. Recognition of a problem is always a good start to solving a problem. Get real, get hard.
Rest in peace JJ. I hope your sad, sad death will come to mean something for us all, specially our children.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Why is Trump Trying to Explain this Crash?
It is rare for Fryday to cover the same subject two weeks in a row, but President Donald J. Trump's pontifications ...
