Friday, June 26, 2020

The Buck Stops There


My friend Zane said it well, “[Health Minister David Clark] let the Team of 4,999,999 down.” Clearly Clark is not a team player; not only did he breach the rules of Level 4 no fewer than 3 times and was missing in action for much of lockdown, he now has the temerity to blame one of his lieutenants for the parlous state of our porous border—a lieutenant, incidentally,  who never went MIA when needed and as far as I know never breeched one of the lockdown conditions.
Clark said that Dr Bloomfield had accepted responsibility for the border situation and then implied that’s where the matter ends. It does not. It defies belief that Clark believes he has no responsibility in this matter. He may have no direct culpability (I’ll come back to that later) but is morally obligated to support his department and if that means uttering that famous saying “the buck stops here’ instead of his the buck stops there, so be it.
Clark’s actions and inactions make him in my view morally bankrupt and unacceptable as a minister or even as a member of parliament.
Now let’s turn to that other matter. Clark compounds his cowardly swipe at Dr Bloomfield and his own failure to shoulder any of the blame by then accusing our frontline people of not properly executing what he said were clear instructions from the Government.
Really, Clark?
Which instructions, Clark, about what you could or couldn’t do under Level Four were not clear to you when you went on your bike-riding jaunts? It seems to have been clear to the other 4,999,999 of us. Or was it simply that you did not properly execute them.
I don’t want to see anybody out of a job—there are enough of them already. But this minister has to step down. It’s overdue, we don’t need him, and we could do without his arrogance at this time—or at any time.
Oh, and one other message—for the Prime Minister—the buck doesn’t stop there (with Clark) either.


Friday, June 12, 2020

Not so Special, K


Life seems to be measured in redundancies and the creation of them. We glorify in issues de jour and the 15 minutes of fame our drawing attention to them gives us. Usually, I ignore them, knowing they will go away, because there is nothing more boring or indeed redundant than an issue in which Television has lost interest.

But where I do have an issue—literally and figuratively—is the current attempt to make history redundant, or at least history as spoken in European terms. The manifestation of that is the removal and threat of removal of all statues recalling past colonisation—exclusively pakeha.

People, on both sides of the discussion divide, are getting very antsy about that, aren’t they? My issue is that they are focussing on that while a far greater and much more aged issue is getting no attention at all.

I am talking about the letter k.

I ask what possible use is it? We already have the letter C, which often serves the same purpose and sounds the same. The two are interchangeable with, I suggest, C being the more dominant. I say get rid of one or the other. Tip one into the harbour. Daub one with paint. Pull it down and leave the other. I see the one we leave being C because I would hate to see a kountry kalled Kanada and at least we get rid of the Kardashians.

Anyone want to join the movement? I have television coverage lined up.

Fryday versus AI

I have decided to restart Fryday.   I’m doing it, in part, because yesterday I promised a very important man in my life that I would and, be...