I am persuaded that Helen Clark is not the  man to replace John Key as leader of the opposition.  
If she is loses next year’s general  election, she is surely gone for good, having done little good. That of course  is a personal political comment and you may well disagree. I, like Helen, simply  do not care. She and I share the view that the opinions of others are a quirk of  nature to be tolerated, though better suffocated at birth. Ours are politics of  predetermination rather than conciliation.
Nevertheless, your opinion is not the  point of this Fryday, so we may without hesitation and with some considerable  satisfaction move on from that to my concern. My concern is that when Helen goes  so will Fryday. Helen, George W. Bush, Brian Tamaki and fundamentalists  everywhere have been the cornerstones upon which Fryday has been built. If I  should lose one of my cornerstones next year with Helen and the year after with  George can Fryday survive? 
Brian Tamaki may well be building God’s  house. But he hasn’t the strength to build Fryday, and when Fryday forayed into  other areas such as sex, which it did recently, I received no reaction at  all—admittedly, par for the course with most of my sexual  excursions.
So, you see my dilemma? You Fryday readers  love Helen Clark and George W Bush. And when you see them you lose all interest  in sex.
I am left with the euphemism of blank  shots and the contemplation of a life after Fryday. And that may well be  something you may want to contemplate as well, or else suffer the real prospect  of in future considering your role in its demise.
The choice is simple: if you don’t want  sex, vote Helen back in.
----------------
Now playing: My Morning Jacket - Into The Woods
via FoxyTunes   
 
